Tips for Writing a Psychology Critique Paper.
The critique should be a balanced discussion and evaluation of the strengths, weakness and notable features of the text. Remember to base your discussion on specific criteria. Good reviews also include other sources to support your evaluation (remember to reference). You can choose how to sequence your critique.
The proposed research method, i.e. phenomenological investigation, and the theoretical foundations of phenomenological tradition as a paradigm in qualitative studies are not explained. The purpose of the research is to “explore the meaning of substance abuser’s experience while receiving acupuncture as a part of the treatment for substance dependence” (Bernstein, 2000).
Unlike many other types of papers requiring only a general description of the main idea or exclusively author’s thoughts, an analysis essay requires deep research and scientific approach. Many teachers like to give the assignment of analysis paper writing because it is a very challenging task to do.
Writing a critical review. Critical reviews require careful planning and drafting just like any other assignment. This guide suggests what to focus on at each stage of the process. 1. Plan your approach. Read your assignment instructions carefully in order to: determine your exact criteria.
A critical analysis is subjective writing because it expresses the writer's opinion or evaluation of a text. Analysis means to break down and study the parts. Writing a critical paper requires two steps: critical reading and critical writing. Critical reading: Identify the author's thesis and purpose.
A research paper is any kind of academic writing based on original research which features analysis and interpretation from the author — and it can be a bit overwhelming to begin with! That’s why we created a step-by-step guide on how to write a research paper, where we take you through the academic writing process one manageable piece at a time.
Sample Research Paper Critique. In “The Password is Dead: Long Live the Password,” Ryan Wade argues against our continued reliance on passwords in an age of cheap alternatives like biometrics or two-factor authentication. As a ten-year network security researcher and lecturer, I must say I find Mr. Wade’s views compelling, intelligent.